SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD introspect

Analyze your Claude Code sessions to discover your developer DNA - gamified performance report with letter grades, archetypes, behavioral patterns, shadow archetype, chrono analysis, and growth tips. Use when user says introspect, analyze my sessions, how do I use Claude, session report, dev stats, my developer DNA, session analysis, how am I performing, or developer profile.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: umang-dabhi v1.2.0 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 4 604 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4604 tokens
    • 85Steps. 66 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -260 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 378: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 66 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    Introspect is a local Claude Code session analyzer whose privacy-sensitive history access is disclosed and aligned with its purpose.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026