SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF delivery-checklist

Pre-delivery acceptance checklist and reusable mini-prompts for common tasks. Use when (1) Preparing to mark story as Delivered, (2) Final PR review before merge, (3) Need quick prompt templates for classification/TDD/refactoring/PR composition, (4) Verifying completeness of implementation. Includes default loop (Plan → Implement → Artifacts → PR → Verify → Deliver) and acceptance criteria.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Toby Morning v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 384 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/acceptance-criteria.md, references/mini-prompts.md

TemplateAI and agentsInfrastructureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
43/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/acceptance-criteria.md, references/mini-prompts.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/acceptance-criteria.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/mini-prompts.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/acceptance-criteria.md, references/mini-prompts.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/acceptance-criteria.md, references/mini-prompts.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 384 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 393: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a simple delivery checklist prompt with no executable code or access requests.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026