SKILLEMALL.ai

AB layered-memory-architecture

Build cheap, truthful long-term memory for agents with a layered architecture instead of a memory blob. Design, explain, audit, or improve a system that separates hot canon, durable topic doctrine, project-scoped working memory, episodic logs, and generated live summaries. Use when creating token-efficient agent memory, reducing memory bloat and context cost, comparing layered memory against generic persistent-memory systems, defining memory boundaries, improving retrieval trust, or migrating from blob memory to a layered model.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: uselesslibraries v0.1.2 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 459 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
    • 85Steps. 84 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1459 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 534: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 8)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation-only guide for organizing agent memory, with no executable code or hidden install behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026