SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD tmux

Remote-control tmux sessions for interactive CLIs by sending keystrokes and scraping pane output.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: utromaya-code v1.0.1 MIT-0 4 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 808 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 6 more places: ClawHub, ClawHub, ClawHub, ClawHub, ClawHub, ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (tmux) differs from the folder (tmux-session-control)
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 14 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 808 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 97: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill does what it says, but it gives an agent broad read/write control over persistent tmux sessions without enough safeguards around destructive actions or sensitive terminal output.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026