SKILLEMALL.ai

BC seo-audit

Audit a webpage's SEO and generate a scored report with actionable fixes. USE WHEN: - User provides a URL and asks to check/audit/review its SEO - User asks "how's my site's SEO?" or "what SEO issues does [URL] have?" - User wants to improve search rankings for a specific page - User asks to review meta tags, headings, or on-page optimization DON'T USE WHEN: - User wants keyword research or content strategy (that's research, not an audit) - User wants to track rankings over time (use a rank tracking tool) - User wants technical site-wide crawl analysis (this audits single pages, not full sites) - User wants Google Search Console or Analytics data (requires API access, not page scraping) - User wants to fix SEO issues (this diagnoses — fixing is a separate step) - User wants backlink analysis (requires third-party tools like Ahrefs/Moz) OUTPUTS: Markdown report with overall score (0-100), category breakdowns (Meta, Content, Technical, Performance), critical issues, warnings, and prioritized recommendations. INPUTS: A single URL to audit. Optionally: target keywords to check against.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: valenciajenkins97-create v1.0.0 1 file body ≈ 598 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Audit a webpage's SEO and generate a scored report with actionable fixes.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerMarketingData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-long description is 1103 chars, limit 1024

Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 37 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 598 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +3Description length 1102: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill performs a straightforward SEO audit of a user-provided webpage and creates a local markdown report, with no hidden execution or credential behavior found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026