SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC meeting-notes

Turn meeting transcripts or voice recordings into structured notes with action items, decisions, and owners. Use when the user shares a transcript, meeting recording, or asks to summarize a meeting. Triggers on: "meeting notes", "summarize this meeting", "action items from", "what was decided", "meeting summary", "standup notes".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ha Le v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 688 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency

ReferenceWriting and documentsPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Consistency w 8
40
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (meeting-notes) differs from the folder (smart-meeting-notes)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 688 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 331: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is a coherent meeting-notes helper, but it automatically stores sensitive meeting content and may use transcription tools or services without clear consent and retention controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026