SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC verbatik-tts-assistant

Turn your AI assistant into a TTS and voice cloning powerhouse using the Verbatik API. Use when generating speech from text, cloning voices, managing cloned voices, browsing 2700+ pre-trained voices, or checking account balance. Covers standard TTS, cloned voice TTS with emotion/speed/pitch controls, voice cloning from audio, and prepaid billing.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Verbatik Technologies Limited v1.0.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 450 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "keywords"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (verbatik-tts-assistant) differs from the folder (text-to-speech-and-voice-cloning-agent)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 34 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1450 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 348: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is a coherent Verbatik text-to-speech integration, but it gives an agent sensitive voice-cloning and deletion authority without built-in consent or confirmation safeguards.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026