BC anamnesis-hub
四层记忆架构 (Four-tier memory architecture for OpenClaw AI agents). 提供 L0 运行时语义检索 (Ollama bge-m3 + SQLite-vec 向量库)、L1 工作记忆 (每日 Markdown 日志)、L2 长期记忆 (MEMORY.md 索引 + ARCHIVE.md 档案 + facts.db 结构化知识图谱)、Dreaming 自动化提炼管线、三方同步 (Cloud ↔ Markdown ↔ Vector)、Active Memory 主动召回、auto-memory v3 两阶段提取 (ARCHIVE.md 归档 → MEMORY.md 摘要)、cross-platform-writer 跨平台写入。适用于首次配置持久化记忆、安装 memory-core/MemOS Cloud 插件、搭建多层记忆系统。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellreferences/setup-guide.md:15Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
vendor-host -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/auto-setup.sh:97Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionsrun sudo curl -L -o "$INTEL_DIR/ollama" "https://github.com/intel/ollama/releases/latest/download/olla…d64"
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/auto-setup.sh:98Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionsrun sudo chmod +x "$INTEL_DIR/ollama"
Files scanned: 21. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1785 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -32 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 394: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.