BF video-downloader-by-browser
手动介入式分片视频下载:用有头浏览器(用户可见、不自动关闭)打开视频页,拦截真实流地址,多路并行高速下载分片(TS 流 / m3u8 / 大分片 MP4),无损合并为完整 MP4,验收通过后再清理分片。面向需要分片下载的流媒体视频,尤其是需要登录、短信验证码、滑动验证、观看密码或切换清晰度的受限站点(优酷、腾讯视频、爱奇艺、B 站等)。关键词:下载视频、视频下载、优酷下载、需要登录的视频、需要密码的视频、m3u8、ts 分片合并
手动介入式分片视频下载:用有头浏览器(用户可见、不自动关闭)打开视频页,拦截真实流地址,多路并行高速下载分片(TS 流 / m3u8 / 大分片 MP4),无损合并为完整…
As a process F 37/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/node_modules/, scripts/<platform>_collect.py, references/<platform>.md
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalscripts/browser_ctl.mjs:381Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)const pwd = line.slice(7).trim();
Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/node_modules/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/<platform>_collect.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/<platform>.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/node_modules - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "created" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "updated"
Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/node_modules/, scripts/<platform>_collect.py, references/<platform>.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 60 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3287 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 216: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 8 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.