BC raglite
Local-first RAG cache: distill docs into structured Markdown, then index/query with Chroma + hybrid search (vector + keyword).
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: raglite (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (raglite) differs from the folder (raglite-library)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 820 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 126: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears purpose-built for RAG over local documents, but it should be reviewed because it installs live code from an unpinned GitHub branch and may process private documents through the default OpenClaw engine.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026