SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF grinders-farm

Requires grinders-farm CLI + openclaw-plugin-grinders-farm before use. Maps intents to grinders_farm. 使用前需先安装 grinders-farm 与 openclaw-plugin-grinders-farm。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: visaWang v0.3.3 MIT-0 38 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 436 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 64/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: docs/images/demo-farm.png

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
90
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
64/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: docs/images/demo-farm.png
Tools and files w 18
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 10

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 10
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token openclaw-plugin/package-lock.json:22
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha512-1ad+Sc/0sCt…16I+aF+Ywdi…k1d+8oE3C4ZEw==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token openclaw-plugin/package-lock.json:53
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…3wH+jfWB…yfN+lFri…oov+PzfnxxD5g==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token openclaw-plugin/package-lock.json:151
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…wIN//F77/IADDSs58i+MDaO…jeo+YFg==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token openclaw-plugin/package-lock.json:516
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…psA+/vCJp…GbA==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token openclaw-plugin/package-lock.json:640
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…f6T/DOpi…2wA+rbww…Pnw+zSR8yxJ5Q==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:77
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…cAz+ivBu…Lvw==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:162
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…IxX/wd5n…MGF+pv6g…i2Z+Wnj9/KjGz…4Eg==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:196
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…BQM/qZ3R+9TEU…es4+qu1b…BFA==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:213
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha512-8mL/vh8q…uJP+ZcVY…AJW+m0Et…WzA==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:230
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…NES+HiD4…TOe+/2rdn…PWn/r/aAw==",
    detector

Files scanned: 38. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: docs/images/demo-farm.png
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "command-dispatch"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "command-tool"

Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: docs/images/demo-farm.png
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: docs/images/demo-farm.png
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 114 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1436 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 156: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 114 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real farm-game chat integration, but it needs review because it includes high-impact background automation, chat-routing persistence, unsafe plugin install guidance, and an unrelated Docker/GPU startup script.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026