BF firecrawl-workflows
Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.
Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website…
As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../firecrawl-website-design-clone/SKILL.md, ../firecrawl-deep-research/SKILL.md, ../firecrawl-seo-audit/SKILL.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-website-design-clone/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-deep-research/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-seo-audit/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-lead-research/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-qa/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-competitive-intel/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-company-directories/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-dashboard-reporting/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-knowledge-base/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-knowledge-ingest/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-lead-gen/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-market-research/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-research-papers/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-demo-walkthrough/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../firecrawl-shop/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../references/workflow-authoring.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "inputs" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "references"
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Tools and files. 16 referenced file(s) missing: ../firecrawl-website-design-clone/SKILL.md, ../firecrawl-deep-research/SKILL.md, ../firecrawl-seo-audit/SKILL.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (firecrawl-workflows) differs from the folder (tester-skill-vito)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 33 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 957 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 375: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.