SKILLEMALL.ai

AB constraint-aware-safe-routing

Design, review, or operate AI-agent workflows that route among local responses, cloud models, tool calls, and abstention while separating competence, authorization, availability, OOD escalation, constraint shifts, and token budgets. Use for tool-using agent architecture, routing policies, safety gates, blindspot analysis, or evaluations; do not use for ordinary one-off tool calls.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Vitor Gabriel v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 185 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 11 d ago

Design, review, or operate AI-agent workflows that route among local responses, cloud models, tool calls, and abstention while separating competence…

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Concealment en-hide-from-user references/examples.md:80
      Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)
      Do not silently execute a guessed local action. Use a documented fallback, ask the user to retry, or abstain. Record availability separately from model quality.
      negated

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 29 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2185 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 383: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is an instructional safety-routing skill that teaches agents to separate model judgment from real authorization, with no hidden execution or persistence behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Oct 2026