SKILLEMALL.ai

AB volcengine-prepare

Use when the user wants to deploy a local directory or GitHub repository to Volcengine and needs the project analyzed, the app shape understood, and a ranked recommendation across ECS, VKE, and veFaaS before choosing an execution path. Also trigger when the user asks "what deploy mode should I use", "is this repo ready for Volcengine", or "check my repo before deploying". This skill prepares the decision; `volcengine-deploy` skill performs the chosen deployment, and `volcengine-iac` skill is used only when the user chooses Terraform/IaC or the task already has an IaC workflow.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: sdk-team v1.1.1 MIT-0 5 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 3 013 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 22 h ago

Use when the user wants to deploy a local directory or GitHub repository to Volcengine and needs the project analyzed, the app shape understood, and a ranked…

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureTerraformGitHubDockerPostgreSQLInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
99/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
97
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 8 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3013 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 583: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 97.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill appears related to deployment analysis, but it over-reads sensitive repository files and includes under-disclosed live cloud availability checks.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 25 Jun 2026