BB byted-byteplus-vod-precision-erasure
Upload video/audio media to BytePlus VOD (Video on Demand) storage, returning the Vid and playback references; supports local file upload (ApplyUploadInfo + TOS + CommitUploadInfo) and URL pull upload (UploadMediaByUrl); also submits precision erasure jobs on ingested media (StartExecution / Operation.Task.Erase): Auto OCR only — default subtitle-only erasure, optional full on-screen text, optional EraseOption ClipFilter (skip/selected); NewVid is always true; optional WithEraseInfo. Trigger keywords: precision erasure, precise erase, VOD upload, subtitle removal, OCR subtitles, remove on-screen text, erase text, StartExecution Erase.
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Secrets in code
meta-credential-filesscripts/.envCredential / dotenv files bundled with the skill (1)scripts/.env
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "env"
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2324 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -32 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 642: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.