BF database-skill
用于火山引擎（Volcengine）数据库（MySQL、veDB-MySQL、PostgreSQL、SQL Server、MongoDB、Redis）和公网自建数据库（MySQL和PostgreSQL系列）的元数据管理、数据分析、开发变更、运维诊断、巡检。覆盖实例列表查询、实例下数据库列表查询、表列表查询、表结构查询、数据查询、数据分析与可视化报告（含跨数据源/文件联合分析）、数据治理（资产盘点/数据画像/数据质量/敏感数据识别）、慢查询诊断、死锁与锁等待分析、事务与活跃会话排查、错误日志查询、表空间分析、健康巡检、监控指标查询、变更工单申请等场景。不支持字节云（ByteCloud）数据库，如 ByteRDS / ByteDoc / ByteRedis。
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/metadata/*.md
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/dbw_client.py:36Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/toolbox.py:543Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
Files scanned: 76. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/metadata/*.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/metadata/*.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 13 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1920 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -35 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 331: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.