SKILLEMALL.ai

AD job-offer-comparator

Use when comparing two or more job offers, deciding between a remote and on-site role, weighing a higher salary against a long commute, moving cities for a job, pricing the real value of benefits, or preparing a salary negotiation counter-offer. Computes true total compensation — base + expected bonus + capped retirement match + risk-discounted equity − health premiums − commute cost (km + parking) − cost-of-living adjustment — then effective hourly rate on REAL hours (contracted + overtime + commute), PTO valuation, and the exact break-even base salary the losing offer needs to match the winner. Outputs a negotiation-ready target number.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: voronindenis5 v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 2 169 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Use when comparing two or more job offers, deciding between a remote and on-site role, weighing a higher salary against a long commute, moving cities for a…

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ReferenceSales and CRMInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 29 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2169 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 646: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a local job-offer calculator whose file reading and Python execution are disclosed and limited to user-provided offer data.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 Aug 2026