AC meeting-load-balancer
Use when your calendar is eating your week and you want to know exactly where the time goes, when planning recurring meetings for a team, before proposing a new recurring meeting, when someone says 'we should sync weekly' and you want data, or when auditing which meetings to kill — imports ICS calendar files, measures meeting hours per week/person/meeting-series (including double-bookings and fragmentation), computes focus-time destruction from meeting placement, scores the true cost of each series (hours × attendees × frequency), flags specific meetings to kill/shorten/make-async using explicit rules, and simulates the recovered hours before anyone has to argue about it.
Use when your calendar is eating your week and you want to know exactly where the time goes, when planning recurring meetings for a team, before proposing a…
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1722 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 680: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.