CD claude-code-task
Launch Claude Code async in background with automatic delivery to Telegram/WhatsApp. Use for coding, refactoring, codebase research, file generation, and complex multi-step automations. NOT for quick one-off questions or real-time interactive tasks. Includes strict thread-safe routing + E2E operator validation workflow.
Launch Claude Code async in background with automatic delivery to Telegram/WhatsApp.
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/testing-protocol.md, WAKE-TROUBLESHOOTING.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlrun-task.py:368Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{bot_token}/sendMessage",vendor-hostquoted -
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlrun-task.py:1040Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)f"'https://api.telegram.org/bot{bot_token_for_script}/sendMessage', "vendor-hostquoted
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 8004 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/testing-protocol.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: WAKE-TROUBLESHOOTING.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 181): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/testing-protocol.md, WAKE-TROUBLESHOOTING.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8004 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 85Steps. 184 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 20 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -258 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 321: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 59 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 184 items
- +4Has examples (22 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.