SKILLEMALL.ai

CD gcp-global-search

Query Google Cloud (谷歌云) product information, documentation, parameters, features, and pricing from official sources without login. Use when the user asks about Google Cloud products (Compute Engine, Cloud Storage, BigQuery, Cloud SQL, etc.), needs product documentation, wants to compare product specifications, or needs help finding specific product parameters and features.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: WBP v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 6 761 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Query Google Cloud (谷歌云) product information, documentation, parameters, features, and pricing from official sources without login.

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:243
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Virus Total | Virus Total | 恶意软件分析服务 / Malware analysis service |

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6761 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6761 tokens
  • 85Steps. 52 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 376: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 43 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not malicious, but it needs review because it mixes a documentation lookup purpose with executable Google Cloud provisioning examples that can create billable infrastructure and include overbroad GKE node OAuth scopes.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026