SKILLEMALL.ai

CD qingtian-psychology-self-study

青田·心理自习室(咨询师实战训练台)。当心理咨询师或准咨询师想要提高、完善、丰富自己的理论与对话实践本领时使用。核心是「练对话」:17 流派 TPR 练习器提供三模式——体验(AI 扮咨询师,感受流派干预)、实操(AI 扮来访者,用户当咨询师施技,可配来访者画像)、督导(贴逐字稿,AI 当督导师做五步分析+五维透镜)。配套理论补课(learn 服务练习)、评估施测演练(21 量表)、个案概念化(cases)、伦理两难决策、反移情记录、成长支持。即用即走:新用户一键默认开跑、一句话可定制,日常只推荐"下一件事",按阶段推进,阶段总结为完成门槛。能力成长按五维衡量:对话技术/个案概念化/理论功底/评估能力/伦理与自我。始终坚持伦理边界:不诊断、不开药、不替代专业心理咨询,危机情况立即提供求助资源与情绪急救包(单源 resources/crisis-resources.md)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: won v2.1.0 MIT-0 80 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 5 034 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

青田·心理自习室(咨询师实战训练台)。当心理咨询师或准咨询师想要提高、完善、丰富自己的理论与对话实践本领时使用。核心是「练对话」:17 流派 TPR 练习器提供三模式——体验(AI 扮咨询师,感受流派干预)、实操(AI 扮来访者,用户当咨询师施技,可配来访者画像)、督导(贴逐字稿,AI…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: 徽章

ProcedureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
54
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: 徽章
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5034 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: 徽章
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: 徽章
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: 徽章
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5034 tokens
  • 100Steps. 107 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 391: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 107 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This local psychology training skill is coherent, but its built-in assessments can miss crisis answers and can overstate clinical care advice, so it needs careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 16 Sept 2026