SKILLEMALL.ai

AD avatar-outfit-motion-video

头像服装动作组合搭配视频——头像、服装、动作三必备主体要素 + 配音口播、背景、物品三可选次要要素,六要素皆可随机生成或指定(配音口播=音频驱动对口型、背景=场景生成/替换、物品=手持广告产品),走「判定→生成→组合→守护」五域管线:生成可独立交付、可自由组合的六要素资产,组合分固定组合(三视图锁身份、动作迁移/配音口播成片)与自由组合(任意要素→静态产物),提示词/产物双方式,输出 AI 换装/舞蹈/走秀/数字人口播/姿势短视频或静态资产。触发词:换装视频、AI 模特穿搭、虚拟试衣、动作迁移、音频对口型、配音口播、数字人、角色三视图、深度视频提取、背景替换、产品植入、手持道具、静态换装图、产品场景图、角色设定图、头像服装动作组合、meta-skill-system。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 波动几何 v1.0.5 MIT-0 26 files body ≈ 1 750 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 17 h ago

头像服装动作组合搭配视频——头像、服装、动作三必备主体要素 +…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 26. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 47 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1750 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 338: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a disclosed AI media workflow, but it needs review because it handles portraits and voices with weak consent/privacy boundaries and includes unsafe model-loading scripts.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 12 Sept 2026