SKILLEMALL.ai

BF connector-hub

连接器全景中心——33 个连接器的统一入口。三层分类(平台级/鉴权便利型/纯API查询型),决策树选择,每个连接器有独立参考文件和可执行脚本(前缀区分)。能用 Skill 替代的提供完整替代方案(scripts/references),不可替代的标注原因。触发词:连接器、connector、MCP、API对接、平台集成、数据源。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 波动几何 v1.0.0 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 3 327 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

连接器全景中心——33 个连接器的统一入口。三层分类(平台级/鉴权便利型/纯API查询型),决策树选择,每个连接器有独立参考文件和可执行脚本(前缀区分)。能用 Skill…

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C27-tapd.md, references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C28-tapd-woa.md

IntegrationNotionGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C27-tapd.md, references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C28-tapd-woa.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C27-tapd.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C28-tapd-woa.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C27-tapd.md, references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C28-tapd-woa.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C27-tapd.md, references/L3-api-project-mgmt-C28-tapd-woa.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 48 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 7 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3327 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -236 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 165: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (31 of 31)
  • +3All 48 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a broad connector hub that can send messages, upload files, and create records in external services, but some of that write authority is under-scoped or mislabeled as query-style usage.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 6 Jun 2026