SKILLEMALL.ai

AC smart-classroom-teaching

智慧课堂教学领域负载物,完整承载智能黑板的 AI 教学能力层(软硬解耦后的软件与方法论),与宿主模型及电脑外设(屏幕/喇叭/麦克风/键盘)协同,端到端执行智能教学与演示讲解任务。覆盖教学可视化、虚拟人思辨引导、课堂实录分析与诊断、个性化因材施教、多模态指令交互、教学资源生成、内容安全合规七大域。触发词:智慧课堂、智能教学、智能黑板、AI黑板、教学可视化、课堂实录分析、教学诊断报告、苏格拉底式诘问、虚拟人教学、因材施教、分层教学、微课切片、教学资源生成、备课、演示、讲解、meta-skill-system。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 波动几何 v1.0.3 MIT-0 14 files body ≈ 1 462 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 9 h ago

智慧课堂教学领域负载物,完整承载智能黑板的 AI…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureLearningtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 37 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1462 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 255: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent classroom workbench, but it exposes student/classroom state through unsafe local rendering and an unauthenticated localhost API.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 12 Sept 2026