SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

DF ai-court

(no description)

Not recommendedlow grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: boluobobo v2.3.0 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 786 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 15/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../LICENSE

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
D
57/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
0
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
15/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../LICENSE
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-agent-memory-dump configs/feishu/SOUL.md
    Agent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (4) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokens
    configs/feishu/SOUL.md, configs/ming-neige/SOUL.md, configs/modern-ceo/SOUL.md, configs/tang-sansheng/SOUL.md

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error frontmatter SKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found
  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../LICENSE

Process rating: all ten parameters 15/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../LICENSE
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../LICENSE
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 786 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -254 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not clearly malicious, but its default templates expose powerful multi-agent bots too broadly unless an admin hardens them first.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026