BC vibe-trading
Professional finance research toolkit — backtesting (10 engines + benchmark comparison panel), factor analysis, Alpha Zoo (462 pre-built alphas across qlib158/alpha101/gtja191/academic/fundamental), options pricing, 90 finance skills, 30 multi-agent swarm teams, Trade Journal analyzer, and Shadow Account (extract → backtest → render) across 27 market-data sources (tushare, yfinance, okx, binance, akshare, baostock, tencent, mootdx, ccxt, futu, mt5, tickerall, local, eastmoney, sina, stooq, yahoo, pykrx, india_broker, qveris, longbridge, nobitex, wallex, plus optional-key finnhub/alphavantage/tiingo/fmp).
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5985 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "dependencies" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "env" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mcp"
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5985 tokens
- 100Steps. 48 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 611: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.