SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF skill-quality-check

Quality audit for AI Agent Skills. Use before installing or after writing any SKILL.md. Scores 5 dimensions with actionable improvements. Works for skills written for Claude, Cursor, Codex, and any AI agent. Keywords: audit, skill, quality, review, score, assess, best practices, vet.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Denny v1.0.4 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 3 693 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 41/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/api-spec.md

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
41/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/api-spec.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/api-spec.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/api-spec.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/api-spec.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 64 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3693 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 284: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 64 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a documentation-only skill that helps review the quality of other skills, with no hidden execution or credential access found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026