SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC lucid-skill

AI-native data analysis via natural language. Connect Excel, CSV, MySQL, PostgreSQL data sources and query with SQL. Use when: (1) user asks to query, analyze, or explore data ('查询数据', '数据分析', '帮我看下数据'), (2) user provides Excel/CSV files or database credentials for analysis, (3) user asks business questions about connected data ('哪个产品销量最高', 'how do orders and customers relate?'), (4) user wants to discover table relationships, JOINs, or business domains, (5) user wants semantic search across tables. NOT for: data modification (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/DROP are blocked — read-only queries only), ETL pipelines, or data ingestion beyond connecting sources.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wenkang-xie v2.0.0 MIT-0 64 files body ≈ 794 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerPostgreSQLMySQLData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 49. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 14 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 794 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 657: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a legitimate data-analysis skill, but it handles database credentials and caches real data samples in ways users should review carefully.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026