BD cc-soul
Zero-vector AI memory engine with self-learning. LOCOMO 76.2% (4th place). 15 original algorithms, open source (MIT).
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlcc-soul/benchmark-locomo.js:682Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (placeholder value)const resp = useGemini ? await fetch(`https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemi…ent?key=… {placeholder -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usecc-soul/benchmark-locomo.js:682Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service)const resp = useGemini ? await fetch(`https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemi…ent?key=… {known service
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Steps. 39 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1947 tokens
- low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 117: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This is a real memory engine, but it exposes and processes sensitive personal memory too broadly for the way it is described.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026