SKILLEMALL.ai

AC secretary-memory

OpenClaw 秘书式多分区记忆系统 v3.0。仿生现代秘书的笔记本分类法,支持:(1) 多分区并发搜索 + 每分区3条上下文召回,(2) 会话自动摘要,(3) 偏好自动提取 + 用户关系图谱,(4) 记忆冲突主动检测,(5) 定时 consolidation + 会话结束 hook,(6) 精细化恢复/回溯,(7) FTS5 全文搜索 + LLM 摘要,(8) 跨会话召回,(9) 容量管理,(10) 自动 Skill 生成。触发条件:(1) 用户提及记忆管理/记忆系统/秘书式记忆,(2) 需要搜索/召回历史记忆,(3) 需要归档或整理记忆,(4) 设计新的记忆架构。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Wgj24 v3.1.0 MIT-0 19 files body ≈ 2 195 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 10 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2195 tokens
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 288: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 14 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real memory-management skill, but it stores and reuses sensitive conversation data and can generate or modify future skills with weak approval boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026