SKILLEMALL.ai

AD yangmou

跨 AI 工具通用的阳谋师 Skill(Agent Skills 标准,兼容 WorkBuddy / OpenAI Codex / Claude Code / Cursor / OpenCode 等)——把"明牌博弈"方法论系统化地应用于销售、营销、管理、职场、投资、产品、谈判七大人际与商业博弈领域。当用户要"搞定难缠客户、谈价压价、锁客复购、在竞争中不可逆地赢、设计光明正大的策略、或拿到对方明知却不得不就范的打法"时触发。工作流:① 四轮询问锁定真实局面(场景定位→对手画像→我的筹码→约束红线);② 调用 scripts/retrieve.py 从 88 条可溯源案例检索原型——73 条原典覆盖《孙子兵法》《鬼谷子》《三十六计》《长短经》《资治通鉴》《君主论》《战争论》等十部古今战略经典(含真实原文引文与出处 URL),另 15 条特斯拉、Costco、网飞、华为等经典商业案例;③ 六层语义分析:解构→识别锁死机制(规则/人性/大势三支柱)→匹配原型→现代领域翻译→设计明牌/造势→反制推演;④ 交付一个对方明知是坑也不得不跳的明牌方案。阳谋不教欺骗:不用假数据、隐藏条款或损害他人手段,先有真实价值再亮明牌;古案经三支柱抽象后可迁移至任意现代领域。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: matan v0.1.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 883 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

跨 AI 工具通用的阳谋师 Skill(Agent Skills 标准,兼容 WorkBuddy / OpenAI Codex / Claude Code / Cursor / OpenCode…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (yangmou) differs from the folder (yangmou-skill)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 34 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 883 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 532: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is transparent about being a business-strategy workflow, but it repeatedly teaches pressure and lock-in tactics that can steer AI toward manipulative advice.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 23 Jul 2026