SKILLEMALL.ai

BF restart-safe-workflow

Safe OpenClaw gateway restart workflow with doctor precheck, checkpoint, restart-health-resume chain, task continuation, reconcile, and user-visible notifications.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Huo Lushan v1.0.3 5 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 334 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 46/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: examples/plan-valid.json, examples/plan-invalid.json, references/phase4-rollout-checklist.md

IntegrationFinanceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
46/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: examples/plan-valid.json, examples/plan-invalid.json, references/phase4-rollout-checklist.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/plan-valid.json
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/plan-invalid.json
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/phase4-rollout-checklist.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: examples/plan-valid.json, examples/plan-invalid.json, references/phase4-rollout-checklist.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: examples/plan-valid.json, examples/plan-invalid.json, references/phase4-rollout-checklist.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 334 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 163: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This restart helper is mostly transparent about what it does, but it can run plan-supplied shell commands and scripts during restart recovery, which is broader and riskier than a narrowly safe restart workflow.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026