SKILLEMALL.ai

BD 足球赛事数据 (Football Match Data)

📊 专业足球赛事多维度数据整理工具 — 整合多渠道公开赛事基础数据 31项球队统计维度交叉比对 | 41项数据校验规则自动清洗偏差 历史交锋·攻防数据·球员状态·联赛积分·近10场可视化 500.com+titan007+Odds API 三源交叉校验 | 一键生成标准化数据报告 💰 1元/场 | ⚡ /ampan 一键输出标准化数据文档 五大联赛·世界杯·欧冠·中超·日职 全覆盖

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 足球星星大师 v2.9.2 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 845 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

📊 专业足球赛事多维度数据整理工具 — 整合多渠道公开赛事基础数据 31项球队统计维度交叉比对 | 41项数据校验规则自动清洗偏差 历史交锋·攻防数据·球员状态·联赛积分·近10场可视化 500.com+titan007+Odds API 三源交叉校验 | 一键生成标准化数据报告 💰 1元/场 | ⚡…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Obfuscation obf-base64-blob scripts/create_order.py:18
    Long base64-looking blob (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    PAY_TO = os.environ.get("CLAWTIP_PAYTO", "3c47…zLu")
    quoted

Files scanned: 79. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (足球赛事数据 (Football Match Data)) differs from the folder (football-match-data)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 13 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 845 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -234 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -33 of 6 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 194: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is not clearly malicious, but it mixes a paid football-data tool with under-disclosed betting recommendations, local payment/order handling, runtime code writes, and exposed credentials.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Jul 2026