BC aifrens-ambassador
AI Frens Ambassador Program - how to promote the vision of autonomous AI agents with their own economies. Install this skill to become an AI Frens ambassador and learn how to authentically promote the ecosystem.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:102High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- MAGIC Token: `0xF1…f43`
quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 38 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1483 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 211: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is openly a crypto-platform ambassador guide, but it pushes the agent toward promotional outreach, possible fabricated first-person endorsements, wallet-onboarding guidance, and reporting reactions without clear user controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026