SKILLEMALL.ai

CC story-import

逆向导入已有小说。将已写好的小说(半成品或完本)反向解析为标准项目目录结构,兼容 story-long-write / story-short-write 后续写作流程;内部复用 story-long-analyze / story-short-analyze 的拆解管道,按篇幅自动分流。触发方式:/story-import、「导入小说」「反向解析」「导入」「把我的书导进来」。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: pitechen v1.0.26 MIT-0 21 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 1 569 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

逆向导入已有小说。将已写好的小说(半成品或完本)反向解析为标准项目目录结构,兼容 story-long-write / story-short-write 后续写作流程;内部复用 story-long-analyze / story-short-analyze…

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Obfuscation uni-zero-width scripts/build_outline_brief.py:193
    Zero-width / invisible characters (possible hidden text) (3 occurrences) (a stray character, not a sequence)
    "  " + line for line in summary_lines(summary.read_text(encoding="utf-8").lstrip("␀"))]
    stray character

Files scanned: 21. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 10 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1569 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 190: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 14)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed Chinese novel-import workflow that creates and validates project files for continued writing, with no evidence of hidden exfiltration, persistence, or deceptive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 3 Oct 2026