SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB compare-pools

Compare all Uniswap pools for a token pair across fee tiers and versions. Use when the user asks which pool is best, wants to compare V3 vs V4, or wants to find the optimal fee tier.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wpank v0.1.0 3 files body ≈ 687 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 687 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 182: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    The skill appears to be a straightforward Uniswap pool comparison helper with no evidence of hidden execution, data theft, persistence, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026