SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD senior-java

World-class Java and Spring Boot development skill for enterprise applications, microservices, and cloud-native systems. Expertise in Spring Framework, Spring Boot 3.x, Spring Cloud, JPA/Hibernate, and reactive programming with WebFlux. Includes project scaffolding, dependency management, security implementation, and performance optimization.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wu-uk v0.1.0 MIT-0 14 files body ≈ 4 340 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

TemplateSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
40/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 3

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 3
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token references/spring-security-reference.md:416
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      void prot…401() throws Exception {
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token references/spring-security-reference.md:437
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      void admi…403() throws Exception {
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:509
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - **senior-security** - For security audits and penetration testing

    Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "domain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "subdomain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "difficulty"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "time-saved"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "frequency"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "use-cases"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related-agents"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related-skills"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related-commands"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "orchestrated-by"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tech-stack"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "examples"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "stats"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "contributors"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "created"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "updated"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "featured"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "verified"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (senior-java) differs from the folder (fix-druid-loophole-cve-senior-java)
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4340 tokens
    • 100Steps. 153 steps
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 344: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 33 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 153 items
    • +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
    • +3All 6 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This mostly behaves like a Java/Spring development toolkit, but its listing metadata claims unrelated purchase/crypto capabilities and some generated guidance needs careful review before use.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026