SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC senior-security

Comprehensive security engineering skill for application security, penetration testing, security architecture, and compliance auditing. Includes security assessment tools, threat modeling, crypto implementation, and security automation. Use when designing security architecture, conducting penetration tests, implementing cryptography, or performing security audits.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wu-uk v0.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 030 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
91
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 9

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 9
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/penetration_testing_guide.md:1
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)
      # Penetration Testing Guide
      fixture
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:2
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      Comprehensive security engineering skill for application security, penetration testing, security architecture, and compliance auditing. <br>
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:22
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      Risk: Pentest-style commands can be misused outside an authorized scope. <br>
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:28
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - [Penetration Testing Guide](references/penetration_testing_guide.md) <br>
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:3
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      description: Comprehensive security engineering skill for application security, penetration testing, security architecture, and compliance auditing. Includes security assessment tools, threat modeling
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:23
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      # Script 3: Pentest Automator
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:59
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      ### 3. Pentest Automator
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:86
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      ### Penetration Testing Guide
    • low Exfiltration read-dotenv SKILL.md:126
      Reads a .env file (documentation of a security skill)
      cp .env.example .env
      security skill

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (senior-security) differs from the folder (fix-erlang-ssh-cve-senior-security)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 54 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1030 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 366: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 54 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is not malware, but its security tools appear to be placeholders that can report success without doing real security analysis.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026