AC restaurant-evaluator
餐饮创业选址与开店评估专家系统，基于"勇哥餐饮创业"视频内容整理的自测表。 用于评估餐饮选址质量、计算回本周期、判断创业可行性。 使用场景： 1. 餐饮选址评估 - 输入选址各项指标，自动计算得分并给出A/B/C/D评级 2. 开店可行性评估 - 评估资金、产品、运营能力等，给出能否开店的建议 3. 回本周期计算 - 输入投资金额和预估营收，计算回本周期 4. 避坑指南 - 识别快招加盟、网红店、大厨依赖等5种必死模型 5. 选择店模型 - 推荐夫妻店、蜜雪型、爆品店、早餐店等4种常胜模型 触发词：餐饮评估、选址评估、开店评估、勇哥自测、回本计算、餐饮创业
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 52 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 735 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 281: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.