CF sum2slides
(no description)
As a process F 30/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: LICENSE, 本地化技能版本/issues, 本地化技能版本/discussions
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 60. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: LICENSE - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: 本地化技能版本/issues - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: 本地化技能版本/discussions - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: CONFIG_GUIDE.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: 本地化技能版本
Process rating: all ten parameters 30/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: LICENSE, 本地化技能版本/issues, 本地化技能版本/discussions
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: LICENSE, 本地化技能版本/issues, 本地化技能版本/discussions
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 44 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1411 tokens
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -242 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -38 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 44 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
- +4Has examples (17 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s core text-to-PowerPoint function is plausible, but its documentation and helper scripts encourage automatic processing and sharing of potentially sensitive chat or meeting content without clear consent controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026