AF skill-router
Route user tasks to the most relevant skills using a layered taxonomy, risk model, and minimum-necessary-loading strategy. Use when deciding which skill to load, when multiple skills could apply, when new downloaded skills need classification, when evaluating whether a skill may threaten the system, or when maintaining a persistent task-to-skill routing policy.
As a process F 48/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/update_skill_index.py, references/skill-index.md, references/usage-stats.json
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/update_skill_index.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/skill-index.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/usage-stats.json - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/routing-decisions.jsonl - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/new-skill-review.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/backlog-priority.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/skill-overlap-report.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/skill-overlap-map.json - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/skill-fusion-view.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/risk-source-review.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/cleanup_download_inbox.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/review_risk_sources.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/check_download_overlap.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/intake_skill.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/track_skill_usage.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/log_routing_decision.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/review_new_skills.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/prioritize_backlog.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/detect_skill_overlap.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/apply_overlap_fusion.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Tools and files. 20 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/update_skill_index.py, references/skill-index.md, references/usage-stats.json
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (skill-router) differs from the folder (skill-taxonomy-router)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 213 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 10 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3840 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 20 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 363: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 213 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.