SKILLEMALL.ai

BB clawlite-mark

中文:Facebook 浏览器自动化技能,支持发布帖子、抓取评论、智能生成并提交回复,支持评论线程化追踪。面向品牌互动与社群运营的高频维护场景。 日本語:Facebookブラウザ自動化エージェント。投稿、コメント取得、文脈対応返信、スレッド追跡返信を実行し、継続的なコミュニティ運用を支援。 한국어:Facebook 브라우저 자동화 스킬. 게시물 업로드, 댓글 조회, 컨텍스트 기반 답변, 댓글 스레드 추적 자동화를 통해 소셜 운영 효율을 높입니다. Español:Automatización de navegador para Facebook: publica, lee comentarios, genera y envía respuestas inteligentes y continúa en hilos. Diseñado para operación de comunidad y mantenimiento continuo de engagement.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: X-RayLuan v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 399 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 61 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1399 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 447: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Facebook automation skill is mostly coherent, but it can post publicly from a live account and includes an unnecessary hardcoded read of a private local style file.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026