SKILLEMALL.ai

BC clawlite-retro

中文:每周/周期工程回顾技能,基于 git 历史与代码质量指标生成交付复盘。支持 24h、7d、14d、30d 周期,附带贡献者分析与成长建议。 日本語:Git履歴と品質指標を使って週次レビューを自動化。/retro 24h/7d/14d/30d に対応し、貢献者ごとの振り返りと成長機会を提示。 한국어:주간/주기적 엔지니어링 회고 에이전트. Git 이력과 품질 지표를 기반으로 /retro 24h/7d/14d/30d 분석을 수행하고 기여자별 피드백을 제공합니다. Español:Habilita retrospectivas de ingeniería semanales (24h/7d/14d/30d) usando historial de Git y métricas de calidad, con análisis por contribuidor y recomendaciones de crecimiento.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: X-RayLuan v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 049 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 44 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1049 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 426: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a local Git retrospective helper whose repository access matches its stated purpose.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026