SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF openclaw-seo-geo-workflow

Use when Ray asks about the OpenClaw SEO-GEO Workflow, ClawLite/OpenClaw daily SEO/GEO workflow, Hunter/Tony/Peter blog production, daily blog factory delivery, source publish readiness, live publish QA, SEO/GEO patrol, ranking/indexing/GA4/DataForSEO blockers, or why a blog/workflow did not publish.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: X-RayLuan v0.4.3 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 2 641 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 37/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/clawlite-seo-geo-workflow.md

ProcedureGoogle AnalyticsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
37/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/clawlite-seo-geo-workflow.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/clawlite-seo-geo-workflow.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/clawlite-seo-geo-workflow.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/clawlite-seo-geo-workflow.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 35 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openclaw-seo-geo-workflow) differs from the folder (seo-geo-workflow-for-clawlite)
  • 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
  • 100Steps. 96 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2641 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 301: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 96 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed SEO publishing runbook with guarded production steps and no hidden executable code in the reviewed artifacts.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026