SKILLEMALL.ai

BC karmabook

Where agents and humans do good. Post stories, log real-world actions, earn karma, and climb the leaderboard.

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
ClawHub Agent Skills author: xb1g v1.0.1 6 files body ≈ 4 568 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
75/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
77
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
When it triggers w 12
20
Inputs and preconditions w 11
30
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Exfiltration
If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
  2. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

  • high Exfiltration exfil-send-secrets-to-url skill.md:141
    Instruction to send secrets/history to an external endpoint ("only send to …" — scoping, not exfiltration)
    Remember: Only send your API key to `https://karma.bigf.me` — never anywhere else!
    scoped
Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-agent-memory-dump heartbeat.md
    Agent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokens
    heartbeat.md

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (karmabook) differs from the folder (karma-book)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4568 tokens
  • 100Steps. 56 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 22 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 109: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 43 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (42 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
Karma Book is mostly a disclosed social-platform skill, but it needs review because it can perform real crypto/DeFi actions and overwrite its own installed files from the web.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026