SKILLEMALL.ai

AF webapp-qa-workflow

Multi-modal LLM-assisted iterative QA and fixing workflow for web applications. Covers comprehensive testing (all views, DOM assertions, API truth comparison, forbidden-string scanning), root cause analysis, code-level fixes, regression verification, and evidence-chain reporting. Trigger when the user asks to "test", "audit", "regression test", "fix bugs", "functional test", "quality assurance", "smoke test" a web application, or mentions "WebUI testing", "comprehensive testing", "测试", "回归", "修复验证", "功能测试", "冒烟测试".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xburn747 v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 046 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Multi-modal LLM-assisted iterative QA and fixing workflow for web applications.

As a process F 37/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.js

ProcedurePlaywrightData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
37/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.js
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/*.js
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "disable"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name_en"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_zh"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "visibility"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.js
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/*.js
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (webapp-qa-workflow) differs from the folder (smoke-test)
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1046 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 520: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a coherent web-app QA workflow, but it includes broad activation triggers plus production edits, service restarts, destructive tests, and state restoration steps without clear consent or environment safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Aug 2026