AF webapp-qa-workflow
Multi-modal LLM-assisted iterative QA and fixing workflow for web applications. Covers comprehensive testing (all views, DOM assertions, API truth comparison, forbidden-string scanning), root cause analysis, code-level fixes, regression verification, and evidence-chain reporting. Trigger when the user asks to "test", "audit", "regression test", "fix bugs", "functional test", "quality assurance", "smoke test" a web application, or mentions "WebUI testing", "comprehensive testing", "测试", "回归", "修复验证", "功能测试", "冒烟测试".
Multi-modal LLM-assisted iterative QA and fixing workflow for web applications.
As a process F 37/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.js
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/*.js - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "disable" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name_en" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_en" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "visibility" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/*.js
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (webapp-qa-workflow) differs from the folder (smoke-test)
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 43 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1046 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 520: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.