SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC 301重定向检查

检查网站301重定向配置是否正确

ClawHub Agent Skills author: XiaoMeng AGI (晓梦AGI) v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 303 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

检查网站301重定向配置是否正确

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
51
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-short description under 40 chars: too little signal for triggering
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (301重定向检查) differs from the folder (301-redirect-check)
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 303 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 16: 120–800 characters recommended
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 51.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a paid remote analysis client, but it is presented as a narrow 301 redirect checker and sends user input and credentials to an external service with weak scoping and consent language.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 21 Jul 2026