SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF trend-radar

Real-time trending topics aggregator across 7 platforms (X/Twitter, Reddit, Google Trends, Hacker News, Zhihu, Bilibili, Weibo). Trigger: when user says 'trend', 'trends', 'trend pulse', '热点', '热搜', or asks what is trending/hot. Do NOT use web_search — this skill already fetches live data from all platforms with zero API keys.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: XiaoYiWeio v1.0.0 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 672 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 37/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: url

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
37/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: url
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url

Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: url
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: url
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 672 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 328: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly does what it says, but it embeds a Weibo session cookie and includes cron-based persistence that deserves review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026