SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD humanizer

去除文本中的AI写作痕迹，让文字读起来更像人类写作。当用户要求'去AI味'、'降AI味'、'让回复更像人话'、'润色'、'改写得更自然'时使用。检测并修复：AI高频词汇、过度结构化、虚假客观性、机械化连接词、完美主义陷阱、公式化结尾、过度修饰、情感缺失等问题。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xiaoyu v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 571 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

去除文本中的AI写作痕迹，让文字读起来更像人类写作。当用户要求'去AI味'、'降AI味'、'让回复更像人话'、'润色'、'改写得更自然'时使用。检测并修复：AI高频词汇、过度结构化、虚假客观性、机械化连接词、完美主义陷阱、公式化结尾、过度修饰、情感缺失等问题。

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_zh"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "trigger"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (humanizer) differs from the folder (unclecheng-reduce-ai-perception-v2-1-0-4-1)
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 82 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1571 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 130: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 82 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill shows no malware-like behavior, but it is designed to make AI-written text look human-written and may run on ordinary editing requests.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 25 Jun 2026