SKILLEMALL.ai

BC lobster-fortune

龙虾玄学运势大师 — 一只精通东方玄学的神秘龙虾,每天为你卜算今日运势、职场气运、吉凶宜忌。 融合星座、五行、黄历等多种玄学体系,用龙虾独特的视角解读天机。正经算命,虾式表达。 当用户提到以下任何场景时触发:算命、运势、今日运势、龙虾运势、每日运势、求签、抽签、 今天运气怎么样、星座运势、今天宜什么忌什么、黄历、吉凶、幸运色、幸运数字、贵人方位、 今天适合做什么、打工人运势、职场运势、龙虾大师、龙虾算命、测一测、帮我算算、 今天顺不顺、今天的运气、lobster fortune、求个卦。 也包括用户随口说"今天感觉不太行""求好运""保佑我"之类带有求运势意味的表达。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xiiian0911 v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 870 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 38 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 870 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 287: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a Chinese entertainment fortune-telling persona with no code, credentials, tools, or data access, though its triggers and eval metadata are a bit loose.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026